Hat tip to Mind Hacks (25 June) for alterting us to the fact that the organisers of the conference on The Law and Ethics of Brain Scanning: Coming soon to a courtroom near you?, held in Arizona in April, have uploaded both the powerpoint presentations and MP3s of most of the lectures to the conference website.
A feast of interesting material here that should keep you going, even on the longest commute, including:
- “Brain Imaging and the Mind: Pseudoscience or Science?” – William Uttal, Arizona State University
- “Overview of Brain Scanning Technologies” – John J.B. Allen, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona
- “Brain Scanning and Lie Detection” – Steven Laken, Founder and CEO, Cephos Corporation
- “Brain Scanning in the Courts: The Story So Far” – Gary Marchant, Center for the Study of Law, Science, & Technology Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law
- “Legal Admissibility of Neurological Lie Detection Evidence” – Archie A. Alexander, Health Law & Policy Institute, University of Houston Law Center
- “Demonstrating Brain Injuries with Brain Scanning” – Larry Cohen, The Cohen Law Firm
- “Harm and Punishment: An fMRI Experiment” – Owen D. Jones, Vanderbilt University School of Law & Department of Biological Sciences
- “Through a Glass Darkly: Transdisciplinary Brain Imaging Studies to Predict and Explain Abnormal Behavior” – James H. Fallon, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine
- “Authenticity, Bluffing, and the Privacy of Human Thought: Ethical Issues in Brain Scanning” – Emily Murphy, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics
- “Health, Disability, and Employment Law Implications of MRI” – Stacey Tovino, Hamline University School of Law
From a deception researcher’s point of view, the chance to hear from Steven Laken of commercial fMRI deception detection company Cephos will be particularly interesting.
Mind Hacks also notes that ABC Radio National’s All in the Mind on 23 June featured many of the speakers from this conference in a discussion of neuroscience, criminality and the courtroom. The webpage accompanying this programme has a great reference list. For those interested in deception research, I particularly recommend Wolpe, Foster & Langleben (2005) for an informative overview of the potential uses and dangers of neurotechnologies and deception detection.
- Paul Root Wolpe, Kenneth R Foster, Daniel D Langleben (2005). Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Promises and Perils. The American Journal of Bioethics 5(2): 39-49